|
Recent Articles
|
NetSuite For IT Resellers
ERP/CRM provider NetSuite recently announced a new vertical solution delivered via NetSuite SuiteBundler, NetSuite for IT Resellers. NetSuite for IT Resellers is said to provide VARs with a single system for visibility into...
State Of California Looking For VAR Help
California is calling on Value Added Resellers for help with state IT contracts. At GovernmentVAR's State & Local Roadshow in Sacramento last week, Arnold...
Cisco Reaches Out To VARs
Cisco has introduced the Cisco Industry Solutions Partner Network, to help build a collaborative and adaptive channel to accelerate customer and partner success. The new Industry Solutions Partner Network will enable a...
Selling Surplus IT Stock
If you are a small or large company, or individual with surplus IT stock which has been used, but no longer is useful to you, consider selling your used IT hardware to a specialist IT buying company. There are Specialist...
Growing A VAR Business
Growing Your VAR Business Through Professional Services Automation Although competitive pressures are intense, the VAR market is highly robust and can be...
|
|
 |
|
12.21.07
Open Source Branding: No Logo Open Source?
 By Roberto Galoppini
My post about SugarCRM's original way to abide the GPL has been reported by Matt Asay, raising the open source brand issue.
Building a brand takes time and money, and just like in any other market drives the demand. What is specific to open source branding?
On the 20th of August 1997 the Linux trademark dispute was resolved, since then anyone in the open source community knows about the importance of brand names. Later on Red Hat started to protect its trademark, bringing the dispute on a commercial ground.
The non-excludable nature of open source code makes difficult to prevent competitors from "stealing" customers, and the argument on the table is, in Matt's words:
You can give away your software. You should never give away your brand.
Trademark laws all over the world enable consumers of products to know the (real) source of the products they use, allowing them to distinguish those products from the products of other vendors. Consumers this way can't be fooled into purchasing a product or a service of one company while believing it is a product of another company.
Few open source firms have the ability to deliver worldwide open source services and support, and the demand for entrepreneurial open source ecosystems is much greater than the supply. Newcomers and open source incumbents could better exploit the opportunity to collaboratively create ecosystems. Open source product firms could re-invent different channel programs, providing qualified resellers with the real ability to deploy even complex solutions. On the other hand newcomers should stop thinking that re-branding third-parties' open source products is enough.
There are still just two ways to make money from OSS, named "best code here" and "best knowledge here" approaches, but none of them scale very well, unless you know how:
- to become the market leader;
.
- to manage collaborative software development.
But appropriating returns is critical and Open Source Franchising is still a good option.
PS: Matt, "badgeware" is probably the most used expression referring to the visibility constraint, which I am not saying is bad at all. Protecting Open Source IP is important, I agree.
Comments
About the Author:
In 2001 started up a small firm specialized in infrastructural solutions based on Open Source software. In 2004 launched the first Italian consortium of Open Source SMEs, becoming its president. Collaborates to academy research on Open Source organizational models and on Open Source meta-districts, keeps rubrics and writes articles on ICT magazines.
http://robertogaloppini.net
|
